The Dutch House of Representatives has rejected the introduction of the Language Test for Other Language Courses (TAO), as an admissions requirement for courses that are fully taught in English or another foreign language. The test's goal was to reduce the number of English-taught programs at universities and universities of applied sciences. But political parties such as VVD and NSC are against the proposal, particularly because educational organizations have already worked on their make-the-language-use-wat-clearer plans.
6 months Ago
University Self-Regulation Becomes Leading Focus
Under the TAO, bachelor's programs would have been required to establish a justification of need for teaching in a non-English language. As universities are ensuring enough tests for themselves, the test is now less necessary, education minister Eppo Bruins (NSC) claims. He commended the proactive attitude of the institutions, saying that "the universities' self-management plans contribute to the preservation of Dutch in education and increase the prospect of international students remaining in the Netherlands.
"
Support from the University Division
Univeristies and universities of applied sciences welcomed the vote. They have long opposed the TAO, saying it would add an unnecessary layer of bureaucracy and could jeopardise the recruitment of international talent. The Universities of the Netherlands (UNL) said the recruitment of international talent is now more crucial than ever, but they also recognised that some challenges in the system would also need to be addressed.
The Association of Universities of Applied Sciences (VH) noted that the language spoken at their institutions has always been Dutch, with 92% of degree programmes now in Dutch. They argue that another test would be a waste of time and resources.
.
Copyright @ 2024 IBRA Digital