Why the Deal Was Blocked
The Investment Screening Bureau, known as the BTI, reviewed the proposed acquisition under the Insufficient Controls of Telecommunications Act, or WOZT. Its conclusion was clear — the takeover posed a real risk to public interest, and it recommended a full block. Aerdts accepted that advice without hesitation, noting that recent signals suggested the deal was close to being finalized, leaving him little room to wait.
One of the central concerns was the reach of U.S. law. American legislation can, under certain circumstances, compel companies to hand over data or restrict access to it — even when that data belongs to foreign governments or their citizens. For a system as sensitive as DigiD, which underpins access to Dutch public services, that prospect raised serious sovereignty questions.
Aerdts was careful to point out that the screening process is country-neutral and purely risk-based. The Netherlands, he stressed, values the role of foreign technology companies — American ones included — in its economy and digital landscape. This was not about targeting the U.S., but about safeguarding a system that millions of Dutch residents depend on daily.
A Deal That Faced Resistance From the Start
Kyndryl announced its intention to acquire Solvinity back in November 2025. The Authority for Consumers and Markets cleared the deal on competition grounds in February 2026, giving it a green light to move forward. But that approval did little to quiet the broader unease.
Members of parliament had been raising red flags for months. Then, in early May 2026, a coalition of Dutch tech experts, journalists, scientists, and privacy advocates took things further by pursuing legal action. They sought court intervention and pushed to be recognized as stakeholders with standing to challenge the takeover — arguing that handing Solvinity to a U.S.-owned company could expose sensitive citizen data to American legal jurisdiction. The government's decision has now made that legal battle largely unnecessary.




